|
Commentaries
Tax Reform
Savings,
Retirement and Social Security Reform
Contributing
Members Commentaries
|
Expensing = MC2 = Economic Growth2
National Review Online
May 15, 2006
By Cesar Conda & Ernest S. Christian

It does not take an Einstein to figure out that high oil
prices are not going away anytime soon - even if the enviro
and NIMBY lobbies finally wake up to reality. The best solution
to high oil prices is an economy strong and productive enough
to "outgrow" them in the short term. In the long
term, the economy must also pay for bringing on line new petroleum
supplies as well as new higher-cost "green" technologies.
And it needs to do all this while providing higher disposable
incomes even after taking into account $3 gasoline.
Right now, the economy is still drawing extra power from the
Bush tax cuts on capital in 2003. But those tax cuts were
modest relative to the high double taxes on capital investment
that continue to exist. And even though the economy grew at
a remarkable 4.8 percent rate in the first quarter of this
year, it is not clear how much longer it can keep up the pace.
The recipe for high GDP growth in the future is the same as
it was in 2003-04, when the combination of lower tax rates
and "bonus depreciation" caused a spurt in investment
that helped lead the economy out of recession and toward its
current strong standing. With the economy needing to pay for
both high-cost energy and expensive entitlement programs already
promised to the baby-boomer and other generations, the time
has come to completely remove the destructive double taxes
on business machinery and equipment.
Standard neoclassical econometric models confirm what common
sense and experience suggest: Replacing old-fashioned tax
depreciation with immediate first-year expensing would add
more than $200 billion to GDP, boost wage incomes, and add
upwards of 750,000 jobs. Because the static revenue cost of
first-year expensing quickly phases out after four years,
it is also in the long term the cheapest, most bang-for-the-buck,
and most growth-oriented tax change the Congress could make.
When you use dynamic scoring that takes into account induced
economic growth, first-year expensing costs nothing.
Expensing is also a high-performance tax reform of vital national
importance from an energy-specific perspective. It would decrease
capital costs in petroleum exploration by 2.3 percent and
in the vital petroleum refining sector by 4.4 percent, and
could be used in the oil and natural-gas transmission industry
to reduce capital costs by 6.7 percent. In electric-utility
production and transmission, the reduction in capital costs
would be in the area of 9.3 percent. It also would be important
to "green" technology where first-year expensing,
in combination with other factors not of a purely financial
nature, can often tip the balance.
Newer and energy-efficient technologies, products, and processes
have higher initial costs than out-dated, less-efficient versions,
especially when they are first introduced to the market. Examples
include combined heat and power (CHP) systems, vehicle efficiency
technologies such as fuel cells, advanced energy engines,
electronic drive-train technologies, and sophisticated electricity-use
sensors and climate controls for manufacturing factories and
buildings. By reducing the cost of investment, first-year
expensing would provide a strong incentive for manufacturers
and farmers to use newer, higher-cost technologies and equipment
instead of relying on readily available products.
The best and quickest way to promote high growth and better
living standards is to accelerate investment in new and efficient
capital stock. Even if there were no energy crisis, Congress
would still be justified in immediately enacting first-year
expensing. After all, it is their duty to help the economy
grow and make the American people better off - and expensing
will clearly do just that.
Ernest Christian, a former Treasury official in the Ford
administration, is a visiting fellow at the Heritage Foundation.
Cesar Conda, formerly assistant for domestic policy for Vice
President Cheney, is a senior fellow at Freedom Works.
|